Talk:Dozer (disambiguation)
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Sophisticatedevening in topic Requested move 17 February 2025
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | On 17 February 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Dozer. The result of the discussion was not moved. |
Requested move 17 February 2025
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Sophisticatedevening (talk) 19:56, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Dozer (disambiguation) → Dozer – Dozer is currently a redirect to bulldozer, but I don't think we can reasonably say that this particularly slang usage is a primary topic over the many other uses of the term listed here. — Anonymous 16:59, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per consensus at last year's RM. 162 etc. (talk) 21:16, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- I fully agree with the consensus that the band is not a primary topic, but I'm equally sceptical that there is a primary topic in the first place. — Anonymous 15:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- 4 of the 5 participants in that discussion supported a primary redirect. 162 etc. (talk) 17:33, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- I fully agree with the consensus that the band is not a primary topic, but I'm equally sceptical that there is a primary topic in the first place. — Anonymous 15:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Nothing has changed since the previous RM. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
- Is there any reason why the verdict of the last RM is being treated as infallible? If we're going by page views, not only does Dozer (band) get multiple times more views than the current redirect of Dozer, but the page Otis (wrestler) gets over twice as many as Bulldozer. — Anonymous 04:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Nobody said it was infalliable. I said nothing had changed. It's still easily the primary topic by long-term significance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:39, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
- Is there any reason why the verdict of the last RM is being treated as infallible? If we're going by page views, not only does Dozer (band) get multiple times more views than the current redirect of Dozer, but the page Otis (wrestler) gets over twice as many as Bulldozer. — Anonymous 04:10, 20 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose. Otis may get more views, but does he get more views of people searching for "Dozer"? According to the article, he only wrestled under that name for "several regional promotions" in 2015–2016. Bensci54 (talk) 17:42, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.