Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rubber Ninjas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Rubber Ninjas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication that it meets the notability and RS guidelines. 67.180.84.52 (talk) 23:43, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this is not my AFD, I'm good-faith submitting it for the IP who wanted it. tedder (talk) 13:30, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (Search video game sources) • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete: metacritic lists a review from the December 2009 PC Gamer UK. Didn't find any other sources. Nifboy (talk) 00:36, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I too think this page should be removed because it has few outside sources aside from its own website Iamcool234 (talk) 18:59, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Although we can't see the PC Gamer source it's likely that it's a small box-out review rather than a full-sized one. The only additional source I could find is Big Download (part of AOL), which is short, unflattering and doesn't give enough material to get this beyond stub-class really. Whether this passes WP:N or not is highly debatable, but that's an aside to the practicality of actually trying to build the article up with next to nothing. It didn't generate enough interest, not hard to see why. Someoneanother 04:00, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.