- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 11:50, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- TravelVegas.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An article covering a non-notable website, failing WP:WEBCRIT. The USA Today reference doesn't cover the company, just the app, and doesn't support the "invests heavily on emerging technologies" claim. — Bill william comptonTalk 16:22, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Spammier than a Hormel factory. --Jayron32 16:34, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 17:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 17:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 17:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - There isn't enough coverage for the company itself. There may be some coverage for the app, but nothing convinces me to keep the article as it is. Michaelzeng7 (talk) 16:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.